Find the evidence behind a knowledge-assistant answer
A useful assistant needs an answer boundary: which source supports the response, whether the requesting user may retrieve it, and what to do when evidence is missing.
Free to explore. Worksheet inputs stay in this browser tab; no account or paid API is required.
Conceptual title image. Any real observation data is identified separately below.
A working retrieval-and-citation demonstration.
This page searches and returns exact extracts from a small public fixture corpus. It does not call an LLM or present generated prose as a verified answer. Every sample document is public. The role selector demonstrates filtering and is not authentication or document security.
Ask the sample documents
Use the example questions or ask your own. Matching is deterministic term-based retrieval with an evidence-coverage threshold; it has no semantic understanding. Questions outside this small corpus should receive no matching evidence.
The fictional source documents are loading.
Run the evaluation, inspect the failures
The six fixed checks cover source selection, recovery evidence, retrieval permissions, a simulated restricted source and an unanswerable question. Run them in your browser and download the actual results. This small regression suite does not measure production quality, resistance to prompt injection or general language-model accuracy.
No evaluation run yet.
Inspect the complete public corpus
These Project Alder documents were written for this demonstration. They are not client records, real personnel assignments or MGCA operating policies.
Project Alder — release evidence guide — Evidence before launch
Fixture role: public · Source ID: release-guide/launch-evidence
A release review requires a named service owner, an evaluation set tied to the task, permission tests and a recovery rehearsal. Open exceptions must have an owner and an agreed next step.
Project Alder — release evidence guide — Recovery and rollback
Fixture role: public · Source ID: release-guide/recovery
The recovery rehearsal must inspect business state as well as application health. Record what can be retried, what must be reconciled and who can authorise a restart.
Project Alder — access guide — Permissions and retrieval
Fixture role: public · Source ID: access-guide/permissions
The assistant may retrieve only documents available to the requesting user. A citation identifies the document and section used; it does not grant access to other material.
Project Alder — access guide — When evidence is missing
Fixture role: public · Source ID: access-guide/unknown
If the approved documents do not support an answer, the assistant should say that the evidence is missing and route the question to its owner. It must not invent a policy or a result.
Project Alder — team planning note — Illustrative budget owner
Fixture role: team · Source ID: planning-note/budget
In this fictional fixture, the budget owner is Sam Patel. Funding changes require the project sponsor's approval. This example is available only when the demonstration role is Project team.
Production retrieval needs server-enforced permissions before content reaches the user, owned source updates, task-specific evaluation and an answer-generation policy. A browser role dropdown cannot protect private documents: all fixtures here are intentionally public. Keep absence of evidence explicit, and make the source section easy to inspect.
Keep the question, assumptions and evidence together. These tools help organise a review; an exported record does not approve a design or certify a system.